THE REALITY OF WORK FOR AN INDIE ARTIST

An honest look at the layers, costs, and the grind.

The fantasy looks like this:

Wake up late, write songs when inspiration strikes, play shows for adoring fans, connect with your audience on your own terms.

Creative freedom.

Artistic authenticity.

That’s the dream, right?

The reality looks more like this:

Wake up early for a shift, squeeze in emails during lunch, batch content after dinner, play a Tuesday night show to twelve people, drive home at 1am, wake up and do it again.

You’re running an unfunded startup where you’re the product, the marketing department, the booking agent, and the overnight employee who shows up tired but shows up anyway.

This newsletter breaks down what the work actually looks like, what it costs to sustain, and the path from doing everything yourself to having a team around you.

There’s a gap in the middle of that journey that most artists don’t see coming.

Understanding it early changes how you build.

— -

The Job Description Nobody Gave You

The music industry tells a lie by omission.

“Just make great music” sounds like advice, but it’s actually a fantasy dressed up as strategy.

Great music is necessary.

It’s also wildly insufficient.

The job you signed up for, or thought you signed up for was “artist.”

The job you actually have is closer to “founder of an early-stage startup who also happens to be the entire product line.”

This isn’t a metaphor.

It’s an operational reality.

Every indie artist plays three full-time roles simultaneously.

You’re the Creator — writing, recording, performing, the work that drew you to music in the first place.

You’re the Operator — managing finances, scheduling, coordinating releases, handling the logistics that make everything else possible.

And you’re the Promoter — marketing, content, outreach, audience development, the work that ensures anyone actually hears what you create.

Most artists want to be creators.

The job requires you to be all three.

The startup parallel is useful here.

Founders don’t just build products — they build companies.

They fundraise, hire, sell, market, and manage operations while also trying to build something worth buying.

The ones who think their job is “just build a great product” tend to fail, regardless of how great the product is.

The same dynamic plays out in music careers.

Understanding this early doesn’t make the work easier.

But it resets the expectations and time horizon most artists imagine when they first get going.

— -

The Economics of Sustainability

Here’s where artists get uncomfortable, so let’s just put the numbers on the table.

The average independent artist with 100,000 monthly Spotify listeners generates roughly $300–400 per month from streaming.

That’s not a typo.

A hundred thousand people hearing your music translates to a few hundred dollars, and that is before distributor fees, before taxes, before any costs associated with creating the music in the first place.

Now add up what it costs to operate: recording ($2,000–10,000 per project depending on approach), marketing and promotion ($500–2,000 per release cycle), music videos ($1,000–10,000), touring (which loses money for most developing artists until they hit 300+ capacity rooms consistently), plus the baseline cost of existing — rent, food, health insurance, the things that don’t pause while you build a career.

The math doesn’t work.

Not at first.

Not for most artists for several years.

This isn’t meant to freak you out.

It’s meant to help you plan.

In startup terms, you need runway… money that allows you to operate while the business isn’t yet self-sustaining.

For most indie artists, that runway comes from a day job, a night job, savings, a partner’s income, or some combination.

The artists who treat outside income as failure tend to quit when the financial pressure becomes unsustainable.

The artists who treat it as a strategic funding source — the seed capital for their own development — tend to build longer, smarter, and with less desperation.

The sustainability threshold is the point where your music income covers your operating costs and basic living expenses without external support.

For most artists, reaching that threshold takes 3–7 years of consistent work, and many never reach it.

Both realities are worth knowing upfront.

— -

The Day Job Dilemma (And Paths Out of It)

The day job creates a paradox: you trade time for money, but time is the resource your music career needs most.

There’s no clean solution, only trade-offs worth understanding.

Out-of-industry jobs — bartending, retail, office work — offer clear separation between “work” and “music.”

The money is often more stable.

But every hour spent in that world is an hour not building relationships, skills, or infrastructure in the world where your career actually lives.

Music-adjacent jobs — session work, production for other artists, teaching, live sound, studio engineering, publishing administration — pay less reliably but compound differently.

You’re still in the ecosystem.

The people you meet are the people who can help your career.

The skills you build translate directly.

The relationships overlap.

A guitarist doing session work meets producers, artists, and industry professionals as a matter of course.

A guitarist working retail meets customers.

Both earn money.

One builds career infrastructure while earning it.

Then there are the funding mechanisms most developing artists overlook entirely.

Publishing deals can be available earlier than most artists realize.

If you’re writing consistently, have a catalog, and a network of up-and-coming writers you are working with, publishers will sometimes advance against future royalties — not life-changing money at first, but enough to fund a release cycle or buy back some time.

The catch: you’re trading future earnings for present capital, and the terms will be less favorable the earlier you sign a deal.

Sync licensing can change the math for independent artists more than most buckets, but it isn’t as reliable as a publishing check.

A single placement in a TV show, commercial, or video game can generate $5,000–50,000 depending on the usage.

I’ve seen artists fund entire album cycles from one well-placed sync.

The income is lumpy and unpredictable, but it’s increasingly accessible to artists who understand how to position their music for it.

We built Fit Out Media to support indie artists for this very reason.

Production and songwriting for others creates income while keeping you in creative mode.

If you can produce, there are artists at every level looking for help.

The rate might start at $500 per song, but it’s music work, and it often leads to co-writes, collaborations, and relationships that serve your own career.

This can also help lead towards publishing conversations.

Overall, the goal is to see clearly that some paths out of the day job also build career infrastructure, while others just trade one form of time-for-money for another.

There isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer, but it is important to understand what your day job is providing you vs. what it is keeping you from.

— -

The 70/30 Split That Kills Careers

Here’s an uncomfortable ratio: 30% creation, 70% operation and promotion.

That’s roughly how successful independent artists — the ones building sustainable careers — allocate their working hours.

At least until they can afford to hire help.

Most artists invert this completely.

They spend 90% of their time on creation and 10% on everything else.

Then they wonder why great music isn’t translating into career momentum.

The logic seems backward.

You became an artist to create.

The business stuff feels like a distraction from “the real work.”

But the real work, at this stage, is building the infrastructure that allows your creative work to reach people.

A song that no one hears isn’t a career.

It’s a hobby.

This doesn’t mean creation doesn’t matter.

It means creation is necessary but not sufficient.

The music is the product.

The 70% is how you get the product to market, build relationships with the people who can amplify it, and create the financial engine that eventually buys back your creative time.

The ratio shifts as you grow.

Artists with teams eventually flip it — spending most of their time on creation while others handle operations and promotion.

But you don’t get there by ignoring the business early.

You get there by building it well enough that it can eventually run without you doing everything yourself.

The compounding irony: you do the business work now so you can do less of it later.

— -

A Working Week, Demystified

Let’s make this concrete.

Here’s what a productive week might look like for a developing artist who also has a day job — meaning you have maybe 15–20 hours per week for music, not 40.

Creation block (4–6 hours):

Writing, recording, or production.

Protect this time.

Schedule it when your energy is highest — for most people, that’s morning or late night, not the exhausted gap after work.

This is 30% of your available time, and it’s non-negotiable.

Content production (3–4 hours):

Batching social content, filming videos, editing.

This isn’t creative work in the pure sense, but it’s how your creative work reaches people.

One focused session can produce a week’s worth of content if you’re systematic about it.

Outreach and relationship building (3–4 hours):

Playlist pitching, blog submissions, booking emails, following up with industry contacts, engaging meaningfully with other artists and potential collaborators.

This is the work most artists skip because it doesn’t feel like “being an artist.”

It’s also the work that opens doors.

Administrative and planning (2–3 hours):

Finances, release planning, calendar management, strategy review.

Not exciting, but essential.

Learning and development (1–2 hours):

Reading, courses, studying what’s working for other artists, improving specific skills.

The artists who stop learning plateau.

That’s roughly 15–18 hours.

If you have more time, expand the content and outreach blocks first — those have the highest leverage for career growth at this stage.

The artists who say “I don’t have time” usually mean “I haven’t prioritized the boring parts.”

Fifty hours per week spent only on creation, with nothing on the business side, often builds nothing but a hard drive full of unreleased music.

— -

Why DIY Isn’t Optional (Even If You Don’t Want to Stay There)

Some artists dream of the day when they can hand off all the business stuff to a team and just focus on music. Understandable.

But the artists who skip the DIY phase almost always regret it.

Here’s why:

you can’t evaluate help if you don’t understand the work.

When you’ve never booked your own shows, you don’t know what a good booking agent actually does — or what they should be delivering.

When you’ve never run your own social media, you can’t tell if a social media manager is actually building your audience or just posting content.

When you don’t understand publishing splits, you sign bad deals.

When you don’t understand management percentages, you don’t know if 15% is reasonable or robbery for what you’re getting.

The music industry has a long history of artists getting taken advantage of by people who understood the business better than they did.

The protection isn’t a lawyer, though lawyers help.

The protection is knowing enough to ask the right questions and evaluate the answers.

There’s a concept in management theory called the principal-agent problem:

when you hire someone to act on your behalf, their interests don’t automatically align with yours.

A manager gets paid whether or not they negotiate the best deal.

A booking agent gets paid whether or not they route the tour efficiently.

Your job is to know enough to tell the difference between good work and bad work — and that knowledge only comes from doing the work yourself first.

DIY isn’t the destination.

It’s the education.

The goal is to learn enough to lead a team, not to do everything yourself forever.

— -

The Gap Between DIY and Done-For-You

Here’s where the standard career advice breaks down.

The traditional music industry model looks like this:

you do everything yourself until you get big enough to attract management.

Then a manager takes 15–20% of your gross income in exchange for handling business development, strategy, and team coordination.

Agents take 10% for booking.

Labels take a percentage for distribution, marketing, and financing.

The economics only work when there’s enough money flowing for everyone to get a meaningful cut.

The math problem is simple: a manager taking 15% of a $200,000 annual gross earns $30,000 — not a great living, but workable.

A manager taking 15% of a $40,000 annual gross earns $6,000. That’s not a job.

That’s a favor.

Which means traditional management has a threshold.

Below a certain level of income — roughly $150,000–200,000 in annual gross — the economics don’t work for either party.

The artist can’t afford to give up 15% of money they need to survive.

The manager can’t afford to spend serious time on an artist who generates less than a part-time hourly wage.

So what happens in the middle?

Artists in the 10,000–100,000 follower range often find themselves stuck.

They’ve outgrown pure DIY — there’s too much to do, too many opportunities to chase, too much complexity to manage alone.

But they haven’t grown enough to attract traditional management that’s worth having.

This is where most artists stall.

Not from lack of talent.

Not from lack of work ethic.

From a structural gap in how the industry is organized.

Some artists in this range hire individual contractors — a publicist here, a social media manager there.

This can work, but it’s expensive and requires you to coordinate everyone yourself, which means you’re still the de facto manager.

Some artists find managers willing to work with developing artists, but the quality varies wildly, and misaligned incentives create real problems.

There’s no clean solution.

Just different trade-offs for different situations.

The first step is simply seeing the gap clearly, because artists who don’t see it coming often interpret structural problems as personal failures.

— -

Motivation is a Lie. Systems are the Truth.

Waiting to feel inspired is a hobby mindset.

Professionals create on schedule.

This sounds harsh, but it’s actually freeing.

If your output depends on motivation, your career depends on an emotional state you can’t control.

If your output depends on systems, your career depends on showing up — which you can control, even when you’re tired, even when the day job was brutal, even when you don’t feel like it.

Systems are just decisions made in advance.

A content calendar is a system: you decided what to post and when, so you don’t have to decide again each day.

An outreach quota is a system: five playlist submissions every Monday, no matter what.

A release schedule is a system: new music every quarter, planned six months ahead.

The artists who build careers aren’t more motivated than the artists who don’t.

They’re more systematic.

They show up on schedule because the schedule exists, not because they feel like showing up.

This matters more, not less, when your time is constrained.

An artist with 40 hours a week for music can afford to waste some of it on indecision and lack of structure.

An artist with 15 hours cannot.

Every hour of a working parent, a day-job artist, a person building with limited resources — every hour has to count.

Systems make hours count.

Build the calendar.

Set the quotas.

Create the structure.

Then just execute.

The motivation might never show up.

The career gets built anyway.

— -

The Long Game Looks Different Than You Think

The artists you see “making it” now mostly started 7–10 years ago.

This isn’t discouraging, it’s clarifying.

Careers aren’t typically built in album cycles or viral moments.

They’re built in decades.

The inputs that matter are small, weekly, and boring: consistent content, steady outreach, incremental audience growth, one relationship at a time, one skill at a time, one show at a time.

This is compound interest applied to creative careers.

A 10% improvement in any skill, repeated monthly, makes you unrecognizable in three years.

An audience that grows 5% per month hits 1,000 in year one and 10,000 by year three.

A network that adds one meaningful connection per week becomes 150 real relationships in three years.

The path from DIY with day jobs to sustainable income to team support to creative freedom is walkable.

It just takes longer than anyone tells you upfront.

Stage one is DIY while funding your career externally.

You’re learning everything, building foundation, operating at a loss.

This typically lasts 2–4 years if you’re working consistently.

Stage two is the gap — too far along for pure DIY, not far enough for traditional management.

You’re generating some income, maybe $20,000–75,000 annually from music, but not enough to quit the day job or attract serious team support.

This is where artists need the most help and have the fewest options.

Duration varies wildly: some push through in a year or two, some stay here for five years, some never exit.

Stage three is team support — real management, agents, maybe a label deal.

The economics finally work.

You’re generating enough that professionals can build careers helping you.

You have infrastructure.

You can focus more on creation because others handle more of the operation and promotion.

Stage four is creative freedom — the original dream, now earned.

You’ve built something sustainable.

The team runs.

The income flows.

You make music because you love it, not because you’re desperately trying to make rent.

Most artists want to skip to stage four.

The ones who build sustainable careers walk through each stage in order, understanding what each one requires.

— -

The Foundation Before the Dream

The work is knowable.

The economics are calculable.

The path is walkable.

It’s just longer and harder than anyone tells you upfront, and there’s a gap in the middle where the traditional models don’t serve you.

The artists who build sustainable careers aren’t more talented than the ones who don’t.

They’re more realistic about what the job requires, more strategic about how they fund the early years, and more intentional about learning the business before they try to outsource it.

Here’s your audit for this week:

What’s your sustainability threshold — the actual number where music income covers your costs?

What’s your realistic timeline to reach it?

What skills do you still need to learn before you’re ready to lead a team?

And where are you in the stages: still in pure DIY, stuck in the gap, or approaching the point where traditional team economics start to work?

The answers shape everything that comes next.

Be honest about where you are, and the path forward gets clearer.

I hope this is helpful.

See you next Sunday,

Neil

— -

DONE WITH YOU MANAGEMENT

There is often a gap between DIY and traditional management.

Done With You Management exists because we see too many artists get stuck in that middle space, artists who have outgrown doing everything alone but can’t access the support they need to break through.

This isn’t traditional done-for-you management.

We’re not taking 15% and handling everything while you focus on music.

We’re building your capacity to lead — teaching the systems, providing the accountability, and filling the strategic gaps — so that when you do reach the point where traditional management makes sense, you know exactly what to expect and what to demand.

Learn More About Done With You Management → here